Qual Redmi Tem A Melhor Camera

Hard truth: most Redmi phones take mediocre photos, but a few actually don't suck

I've shot hundreds of test photos across every mid-range Redmi that's come out since 2020. The short answer is that camera quality on these phones is wildly inconsistent. You can spend R$1.500 and get something decent, or you can spend R$2.500 and still get garbage. Here's the breakdown of where to actually look.

qual redmi tem a melhor camera em 2025-2026

The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G currently sits at the top for pure camera hardware in the Redmi lineup. It uses the Sony IMX882 (also called HP3) 200MP sensor with OIS. That's the same sensor family Xiaomi puts in their more expensive phones. For the money, it's genuinely hard to beat unless you're willing to step up to the Xiaomi-branded devices, which are a different product line entirely. The Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G is still competitive if you find it on sale. The Samsung HP1 50MP sensor with OIS handles low light better than most people expect, but the processing pipeline from Xiaomi's photo team started showing its age around 2024. Colors lean oversaturated in daylight and the HDR blending can look muddy in backlit scenes. I personally gave up trying to fix this in post on the Note 12 Pro+ and just switched to RAW mode for anything that mattered.

The Redmi K70 and K70 Pro deserve a mention too. They're technically under the Redmi sub-brand in China and sometimes appear in Brazil through import channels. The K70 Pro has a Sony LYT-900 primary sensor which is a significant step up from what's in the Note series. But there's a catch: MIUI/HyperOS on K-series phones often has slightly different camera tuning because they target a different market. If you buy a Chinese import version, you're dealing with potential app compatibility issues and sometimes no WhatsApp video call camera optimization. That's not a small thing.

What actually matters on these sensors

People obsess over megapixels on Redmi phones because the marketing pushes that number everywhere. A 200MP sensor sounds impressive on paper, but the real question is how Xiaomi's image signal processor handles pixel binning. The Note 13 Pro+ bins down to 12.5MP by default, which means each pixel is effectively larger and captures more light. That's why the low-light performance is decent despite the phone costing under R$2.000. Here's the counter-intuitive part that most reviewers miss: the ultrawide sensor on the Note 13 Pro+ is a 50MP Samsung S5KJN1, which is actually better than the ultrawide on phones that cost twice as much. But Xiaomi still tunes it poorly. The color mismatch between the main camera and ultrawide is noticeable in single-tap shots. I've learned to shoot in RAW and match the white balance manually in Lightroom mobile. It adds about 45 seconds to my workflow but eliminates the jarring color shift that makes those photos look obviously phone-generated.

The telephoto lens is where Redmi cuts corners. There isn't one on most Note series phones. You're getting optical zoom only through pixel binning and cropping, which degrades quality fast past 2x. If you need actual telephoto, look at the Redmi K70 Pro which has an 8MP 2x telephoto. It's still mediocre by flagship standards, but it's better than digital zoom.

Practical problems I ran into and workarounds

Last month I was shooting a friend's wedding with the Note 13 Pro+ as a backup phone. The main issue hit around 7pm in a dimly lit venue. The phone was hunting for focus constantly and the computational photography was creating these ghosting artifacts around moving subjects. The workaround was simple but not obvious: switch to Night Mode even though it was only somewhat dark. Night Mode on this phone uses a longer exposure combined with multi-frame stacking, and it actually produces cleaner results than the default computational photography in low-to-moderate light situations. The tradeoff is you need the phone to be stable, so I used a mini tripod or leaned against a wall. Handheld Night Mode shots from this phone tend to smear more than the default night picture mode. Another problem: the 200MP mode. Don't use it unless you have exceptional lighting and a tripod. The file sizes are enormous (roughly 40-50MB per photo), the processing lag is noticeable (about 2-3 seconds before the photo is saved), and the detail advantage over the binned 12.5MP mode is barely perceptible on a phone screen. On a 27-inch monitor viewed at 100% zoom, maybe. In real world use, the 12.5MP output looks just as sharp because the pixel binning does a reasonable job of preserving detail while reducing noise.

Also worth noting: Xiaomi's camera app on Redmi phones sometimes has a "AI Camera" feature that defaults to ON. It aggressively enhances saturation and contrast automatically. If you're shooting anything for professional or semi-professional use, turn it off in settings. The AI processing adds about 0.8 seconds of lag per photo and produces results that look overcooked. I lost a good shot once because the AI decided to blow out the highlights in a sunset scene, and by the time I disabled it, the lighting had changed.

Alternative if you can stretch your budget

If you're asking this question because you genuinely care about phone photography and the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ still doesn't feel like enough, the Xiaomi 13T or 13T Pro (Leica-tuned, available in Brazil) is a meaningful upgrade. The camera hardware jumps to a Sony IMX989 type sensor on the 13T Pro, and the Leica color science produces images that look more natural out of the camera. The processing is less aggressive, the dynamic range is wider, and the video stabilization is noticeably better. The tradeoff is price — these typically run R$3.000 to R$4.000 versus the Note 13 Pro+'s R$1.800 to R$2.200 range. For pure value within the Redmi brand, the Note 13 Pro+ 5G is the answer to qual redmi tem a melhor camera right now. It's not a flagship camera, but it's the closest you'll get at this price point, and it handles the vast majority of everyday photography situations competently.